| Main
> Resources>
Archive
> Young defendants win separate trials in Bellevue murder case
Title: Young
defendants win separate trials in Bellevue murder case
Source: The Seattle Times, October 7th,
1998
NOTICE:
The following material is copyrighted as indicated in the body of text.
It has been posted to this web page for archival purposes, and in doing
so, no claim of authorship is expressed or implied, nor is a profit being
made from the use of the material.
Copyright © 1998 The Seattle Times
Company
Posted at 12:55 p.m. PDT; Wednesday, October
7, 1998
Young defendants win separate trials in
Bellevue murder case
by Alex Fryer
Seattle Times Eastside bureau
In a surprise move, King County Superior
Court Judge Michael Spearman decided today to try the two defendants separately
in Bellevue's worst-ever murder case.
The decision came after testimony from
a psychologist who had interviewed one of the defendants, Alex Baranyi.
Psychologist Karen Froming testified that
Baranyi was depressed before the 1997 murders of the four-member Wilson
family and was under the influence of the other defendant, David Anderson.
Attorneys for both defendants asked for separate trials. The prosecutors
did not challenge the motion.
"Both defendants are blaming the other,"
said Special Deputy Prosecutor Jeff Baird. "Mr. Baranyi will say Devil
Anderson made me do it. Mr. Anderson will say Mr. Baranyi did it himself."
Jury selection in the Baranyi trial was
set to continue this afternoon.
A new trial for Anderson has yet to be
scheduled.
If convicted of the four counts of aggravated
first-degree murder, Baranyi and Anderson, both 19, will spend the rest
of their lives in prison.
Although Baranyi and Anderson are pursuing
different defense strategies, prosecutors will seek to prove both defendants
took an active part in the slaying of William and Rose Wilson, and their
daughters, Kimberly, 20, and Julia, 17.
To do so, they must present a stream of
physical evidence and testimony that one prosecutor predicted would be
"two months of horror and disbelief."
In statements to police made soon after
he was arrested, Baranyi said he and an unnamed, unidentified accomplice
strangled Kimberly Wilson in Woodridge Water Tower Park on Jan. 3, 1997.
He said he later walked into her unlocked
house about a half-mile away and bludgeoned her family. Baranyi would not
implicate Anderson to detectives.
Baranyi's statements to police are only
a portion of the evidence gathered against him, however. The Wilsons' telephone,
compact-disc player and VCR later were discovered in a room he rented,
and, according to prosecutors, he told a psychologist that he "never felt
better" than after the slayings.
Medical examiners are expected to testify
that the weapons used to kill William and Julia Wilson were a sword and
a baseball bat. That raises the possibility that they were assaulted by
more than one attacker.
Scores of witnesses are expected to testify
that Baranyi and Anderson were best friends who acted out Gothic fantasies
and played "Dungeons and Dragons," a game in which participants create
elaborate make-believe worlds of swords and sorcery. However, the judge
will exclude testimony from two Eastside role-playing groups that banished
Baranyi and his friends for crossing the line from pretend violence to
real contact.
Prosecutors will present several witnesses
who heard both defendants talk about their desire to murder with baseball
bats and knives.
Attorneys for Baranyi have sought to argue
that he suffers from bipolar disorder and was mentally unable to plan the
slayings. Although Spearman initially rejected the request to pursue a
diminished-capacity defense, Baranyi's attorneys filed a second motion
after a state Supreme Court ruling, handed down Thursday, lowered the standards
for when such a defense can be used.
Spearman ruled today that Baranyi could
present a diminished-capacity defense. It is an infrequently used defense
aimed to either gain an acquittal or conviction on a lesser charge.
During jury selection last week, lawyers
for Anderson compared their situation to O.J. Simpson's double-murder trial.
Like the Simpson legal defense team, attorneys for Anderson are likely
to contest every shred of physical evidence and testimony.
Reminding potential jurors of the public
outcry that followed Simpson's acquittal, in his double-murder trial, attorney
Michael Kolker asked: "Are you prepared to endure that same criticism if
you render an unpopular verdict?"
"The real question is not, did Mr. Anderson
commit this crime, but did the state prove beyond a reasonable doubt that
Mr. Anderson committed this crime."
Kolker then asked, "Is anyone anxious to
be on this jury?"
The courtroom was silent.
Alex Fryer's phone message number is 206-464-8124.
His e-mail address is:
afryer@seattletimes.com
|